Dear friends
Thank you for the amazing response to last week’s article about Divine Intervention. It was great to get so many comments. Your comments have really helped me to synthesize and clarify a number of my views, which I’ll be publishing over the next few weeks.
Today I want to take a break from the serious work of “contemplating god” and ask for your help in a fun experiment. We are going to do our own vaguely pseudo-scientific test of distant healings.
This should be great fun and also an interesting lead-in to the articles I was going to write next week about distant healing generally and the power of prayer (or why it doesn’t seem to work the way it should).
We have some chickens that have gone off laying. I thought you could help me with “distant healing” of the chickens. We can measure the number of eggs each day to determine if it’s helping.
Before anyone writes in to say “that’s not very scientific Simon,” I know. This is about fun. Plus it’s not that often I get to ask you for help, and this seems a great moment. And before anyone else writes “that’s a rooster Simon, they are not meant to lay eggs… I know that too. The hens are in the background, and if you need a photo to send distant healing the one below (at night in their cage) shows all of them.
Today’s experiment is dedicated to one of our readers, Kim, who was asking whether my thoughts against divine intervention meant that I did not believe in distant healings. As a matter of fact I’m quite open to the idea. The scientist in me doesn’t necessarily know how or why they work, but I’ve seen some interesting results. I’ve been dealing with a little chicken crisis lately and Kim gave me an idea for resolving it in a fun way.
Chicken dramas
OK here’s the problem: something is spooking our chickens. We have about 21 chickens (they are hard to count when running wild) and we used to get about 20 eggs per day. Then it dropped to 18. Then it dropped to about 6. Within a very short period we were hardly getting eggs. The chickens look fine, they are happy to see me, eat voraciously and love running around scratching through the grass for works etc. But they aren’t laying. It could be the change in weather (we are at the end of the wet season), it could be they are spooked. Something could be eating eggs but I’ve only seen one broken eggshell so I doubt it. It could be diet – though I thought giving them fruit and vegetable scraps was a good thing (they are back on laying pellets).
My neighbor Mark (who owns the chickens – we bought his house and the chickens have stayed on) has been experimenting with their diet, trying different things. So far not much luck – well we are back to 13 but not where we should be.
The experiment
I would like everyone who can spare 3 minutes to send any form of distant healing to the chickens. There are no rules or guidelines. Any modality or prayer is fine. The intention is maximize the chicken’s egg laying in a safe and healthy way, by resolving any underlying issues, stress or trauma.
How you do that is up to you. You can send unconditional love, channel energy, resolve trauma, do proxy EFT tapping or even pray to the Flying Spaghetti Monster (my Deity of choice this month). I’d like at least a few RPT practitioners to use the Level 1 pretending technique to resolve trauma, or the Level 2 conception/fertilization methods for re-patterning.
Incidentally I have not done any healings on the chickens. That would totally invalidate the results of a test on distant healing.
Monitoring progress
There are lots of scientific tests of distant healing. This one is quite different – we actually have something to measure our progress by. I count the eggs every day. This is unique – all the scientific tests of distant healing were indirect – measuring things like days spent in hospital – because it’s hard to directly measure someone’s health objectively.
But counting eggs – that’s simple and meaningful. I would almost call it scientific except that we’d need a control group and a lot more hens! But the basic idea is valid, and it’s going to be fun.
Every day I will report the number of eggs laid here.
| Date (Vanuatu)
|
Number of eggs | Comment |
| 19 March | 7 | Improved diet – laying pellets |
| 20 March | 8 | |
| 21 March | 10 | |
| 22 March | 11 | |
| 23 March | 12 | |
| 24 March | 11 | |
| 25 March | 7 | |
| 26 March | 8 | |
| 27 March | 14 | 1 broken and/or eaten by hen |
| 28 March | 13 | Start experiment |
| 29 March | 13 | |
| 30 March | 12 | |
| 31 March | 16 | 1 broken/eaten (13 day + 3 night) |
| 1 April | 14 | |
| 2 April | 18 | |
| 3 April | 19 | Fantastic news! |
| 4 April | 19 | |
| 5 April | 17 | |
| 6 April | 16 | |
| 7 April | 18 | |
| 8 April | 15 | |
| 9 April | 16 | |
| 10 April | 13 | Heavy rainfall has restricted bird and reduced egg |
| 11 April | 14 | |
| 12 April | 15 | |
| 13 April | 15 |
Thanks for joining me in this fun experiment. I look forward to sharing some interesting results with you. (Whether it works or not, it will be interesting.)
Please leave your comments here – what do you think of the experiment? What happened when you tried to help? Did you pick up any specific issues I should look at?
blessings,
Simon
Edit (30 March): Not looking too good so far guys, numbers are dropping since start of experiment. Even if the distant healing doesn’t help, it shouldn’t hurt!?! Two theories: 1) chickens don’t like hundreds of people “working on them”, 2) it takes more than a few days for the benefit to kick in – what’s the “lead time” on an egg? Or maybe the distant chicken healings just don’t work? We’ll keep this going at least another week before I change any other variables (supplements etc).
Edit (31 March): Progress at last? At first I thought that we were down to 13 today but then I saw that the gardener had put 3 eggs aside last night (I check them at 11am usually). So 16 eggs! We’ve broken though that barrier, here’s hoping it keeps going up. To be consistent I’m counting the number of eggs based on the day they were laid, not just my 11am run.
Edit (3 April): Fantastic news, 19 eggs means pretty much every chicken is laying 1 per day. We are very happy with this result. We will keep posting results at least a week to make sure it’s permanent. Thanks everyone for your help.
Edit (13 April): Well, we’ve finished the experiment, or at least filled the initial table. I may keep it going a little longer. Basically the initial results were good – it peaked quickly. But then it settled back down at a lower level than I’d like. There are so many factors we can’t control – rain, temperature, humidity, pesky pigs, etc, that this seems to be as good as we can do for now.
What do you think the experiment proved? (if anything)


A great idea. Practising on non-humans may build confidence and help when we work remotely with and for people, especially when the results are going to be so concrete . That’s particularly pertinent for me right now so I’m happy to play.
I teach RPT and I always stress to students that a person does not have to be sitting next to you for RPT and other healing techniques to work. Neither does a person even have to know (see a much earlier discussion on permission). BUT, it’s far more empowering if you work WITH rather than ON a person. Also, secondary gain can be trickier to pick up without the person’s involvement and we know that that’s usually why a difficulty is held in place.
Chickens, though. There’s not likely to be much SG there though you never know.
Now I’m going to spend a minute or two scratching around with those chickens and see what pops up, or hopefully pops out.
Cluck cluck x
[Reply]
Simon Rose Reply:
March 28th, 2011 at 6:45 pm
I agree with your comments except perhaps the funny one – that there wouldn’t be secondary gain for chickens. If we are taking this seriously (which is a bit hard!), surely laying an egg is the chicken’s equivalent of work, so the secondary gain is the same as you and I get when we get out of work!
SR
[Reply]
Sue Healy Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 6:21 pm
Point taken. A whole new meaning to the phrase “Go to work on an egg”. (advertising slogan in the UK in the 60s) x
[Reply]