Are gut feelings misleading?

In yesterday’s blog about the dangers of sharing spiritual beliefs, I mentioned the conundrum I often experience when people get a strong feeling or gut instinct that they disagree with me. I think many people make intuitive decisions based on gut instincts. That seems to be a good thing, but if they don’t understand their instincts, they could be making some really bad decisions.

There’s a certain paradox here that is worth discussing with you – I’m interested in your thoughts on the issue.

Listen to your gut

Your gut instinct (e.g. that queasy feeling you might get in your belly) is a powerful form of intuition, sometimes called clairsentience.  Lots of spiritual courses help people to connect to their feelings (heart) or instincts (gut) and encourage this intuition.

There is a problem with this though. If the person isn’t “clear,” they will get what I might call a false reading.

I want to give a few examples, starting with a simple one.  Imagine you are talking about money and a new business idea that’s really simple and could provide your friend with absolute financial freedom. Perhaps you are offering to lend them the money to start their dream business.  Instead of gratitude they look ill. They feel really bad about the whole thing and they decline your offer of help on the basis that “it doesn’t feel right.”

I ask: is this being intuitive or is this fears and worthiness issues blocking a person? Are they confusing their inability to accept a gift with an intuitive insight?

Deeper example:

True story: I’m talking to a healing practitioner about RPT. I was explaining how instead of divine intervention we believe in healing from within. This potential client thought about this and said “this doesn’t feel right for me.”

Now far be it from me to question people’s feelings. I spend most of my working life helping people to connect with their feelings. But I also know that feelings are misleading. So I asked this woman to explore what she felt in her gut by placing a hand over her belly and feeling into it.  What she felt was fear.  Cutting a long story short, it was the fear that what I said might be right. Fear of the consequences – after all she had built an entire healing practice based on prayer and divine intervention. What if I was right and healing only comes from within?

This isn’t a debate about divine intervention (we did that last week!), I merely want to make a point about gut feelings. They can be misleading.

Instead of rejecting something outright because she “trusted her gut,” this woman learned a vital life lesson – her gut was merely signally a threat. Some threats are real (like down go down that dark alley tonight), but mostly threats are perceived.  With few physical threats in our day-to-day lives, our bodies respond to broader existential threats.

Very few people know and understand this – that your body’s fear might be an indication that something is very good for you instead of bad for you.  It depends on how “clear” you are (for lack of a better word). If you are a yogi who’s spent lifetimes in a cave meditating, I suspect your gut insticts are spot on. If you have done the RPT work on coherence, you’ll be fine. But the average person who’s done a spiritual healing course and learned to listen to their gut is liable to get into trouble.

Conclusion: A funny feeling in your gut means there’s something you need to listen to. It is not a “litmus test.”  It does not give you a yes/no answer. It doesn’t mean this is “good/bad.” It means: Stop, Listen, Feel into this. Find the deeper meaning or message. Explore what your body is triggered by.  Do not make a decision on the basis of a gut reaction alone.

It probably goes without saying the the above comments apply equally to other forms of intuition like clairvoyance, clairvoyance etc.

Before I wrap up for the day I had some other things on my  mind to talk about.

New ideas and old truths

Earlier today a reader (“Dalben”) left a comment accusing me of rehashing old truths rather than proving new ones. I found this funny. Are there really any new truths?  I can’t tell you how delighted I would be to help take the world back to an older truth (pre Judaeo-Christian concepts of God as a male entity that judges you for your good and bad deeds and determines whether you get into heaven).  There would be nothing better for this planet than to re-wind the “God clock” a few thousand years.  So why on earth did this reader think that it was a bad thing that my teachings are very similar to the Tao, or have vaguely shamanic leanings?  His attack was the highest form of compliment!

There are some genuinely new ideas here but they aren’t totally new. I think my NLP teacher Chris Howard said it best when he said “If I stand tall, it’s because I stand on the shoulders of those that came before me.”  (He was referring to Tony Robinson’s shoulders.)

If I can introduce a new philosophy it is this: I strive to unite 2 schools of thought that have never before been united, the Tao and ultra-Darwinism. Two universal truths (not merely beliefs) that merely haven’t been combined before. If you hear me speak of “spiritual atheism” it is this unity I refer to.

[Incidentally speaking of my fear of speaking out, I have barely mentioned evolution on this blog for fear of offending my Christian and Moslem readers.  That will change very soon as I believe I have found ways to explore the facts of evolution without upsetting too many people's Gods.]

Your comments

As always, I’d love to hear from you. What are your thoughts about gut insticts? Does your gut always lead you in the right direction or does it lead you astray? What do you think about the idea that the thing you are afraid of might be really good for you?

Looking forward to your input.

Simon

19 Comments
March 30, 2011 in RPT theory and teachings, Thoughts For the Day

19 Responses

  1. A decision based on a gut reaction can be like a knee jerk reaction…automatic without real merit or giving the situation an honest evaluation. Like you said, a lot of gut reactions are based in fear. I think we develop this fear from past experiences, what we inherit from our family and simply not completely understanding a situation. Sometimes our gut reactions are spot on like when we feel it’s a stupid idea to play with a poisonous snake. That’s a built in primal survival gut reaction. But other gut reactions are not as healthy (although based on survival) and can’t be trusted at face (or gut) value. In my opinion, it’s important to step back and assess the situation when your gut kicks in. Since we store so much emotion in our gut, we have to remember that emotion and logic (reality) are not always the same. So, no, I don’t think we should automatically trust our gut instinct. Add a dose of logic to the mix and ask what is scaring you about the situation and why. Then go from there.

    [Reply]

    Simon Rose Reply:

    If only everyone were as level headed as you.

    Far too many people make decisions based on gut insticts they don’t udnerstand. Bt in the scheme of new age sins, that’s nothing. Remind me to tell you the story about the woman who pulled out from a course (after paying) because her angels told her to. [She couldn't actually hear her angels; her spiritual healer told her her that angels told her .... and silly Simon suggested it was more likely that the spiritual healer feared that after the course she wouldn't need to be wasting money on spiritual healers...]

    sigh… and giggles

    Simon

    [Reply]

    WendyB Reply:

    Wow, wow, wow! That is making my head explode and I don’t even know the whole story. How tragic for both of them…

    [Reply]

    Ben Ralston Reply:

    Oh Simon, don’t get me started on angels… I could tell you a (similar) story that would chill you to the bone.

    Victor Reply:

    This is so true regarding ppl said their angels told them this and that. Whereas they usually locked in their own gunk and fear of being threaten!

    Then, how good they r manifest the angel card come out the answer that fit into their fear/fantasy.

    [Reply]

  2. I agree. The most difficult thing about developing intuition is being able to distinguish between true inner guidance and subconscious junk. I’ve found there’s usually a difference in the quality or feel between the two. The subconscious junk voice feels more reactive and primal whereas the inner guidance voice feels more refined and relaxed. The subconscious junk voice usually has more of a fear element to it whereas the inner guidance voice is usually more positive eg. the inner guidance might come from the perspective that A is a better choice than B whereas the subconscious junk voice might come from the perspective that B is bad so it should be avoided. However that’s not to say the inner guidance voice is always happy and positive. On occasions where I’ve received true inner guidance about something negative I’ve found the quality difference has to do with the sense of urgency. The inner guidance voice has a real sense of urgency about it whereas the subconscious junk voice is more of a moan and groan.

    Having said that, it’s not always that black and white and sometimes it’s too difficult to tell the difference. I always consider what my logical mind has to say as well and if there’s genuine conflict or confusion then it’s usually best to go away and give it more thought.

    [Reply]

  3. Actually, here’s an interesting hypothetical question. You’re booked to do a course somewhere and have to fly to get there. You’re on the last possible flight and know if you miss it the course will have to be cancelled. You usually have no fear of flying and maybe even enjoy it. However, as you’re about to go through the boarding gates a strong sense of fear and foreboding comes over you. Your gut is strongly telling you not to get on the plane but you’ve got no time – the gates close in 5 minutes. You have to decide now. Do you get on the plane or not? Do you do a quick RPT on yourself and then decide? Do thoughts of having to cancel the course, disappointing a heap of people, losing a heap of money and having to explain why you cancelled the course if it turns out your gut was wrong sway you?

    [Reply]

    Ben Ralston Reply:

    That would simply be a great test of how much you trust your instincts – to use Simon’s lingo above: how ‘clear’ you are.
    I agree completely with your statement: “The subconscious junk voice feels more reactive and primal whereas the inner guidance voice feels more refined and relaxed”.
    You’d have to search deeply to check which of those ‘voices’ it is…

    [Reply]

    Peter Taylor Reply:

    Isn’t this line of discussion saying the same thing about which conscience is ruling first when the question is asked?? Is the head (associated by the symbolic version of the devil) and the heart (symbolic of the angel) on one’s shoulders?

    OR

    the popular one is which wolf is being fed, the angry one or the calm one?

    Cheers,
    Peter.

    [Reply]

  4. Very good article, Simon. Perfect examples. You speak really abou stuff that missed by many other teachers.

    People still couldn’t find the difference between facts and opinions. They take somebody opinions as a fact and live with it. Your example situation in reply to WendyB is just another proof of it.

    So it’s really difficult to speak about intuition. For if person have no thech to work with gut feeling to find out what it really means, it will simply use opinion instead of fact. And it could cause a problem.

    [Reply]

  5. Jørgen Mæhre

    Love the article Simon :) You ask: “Does your gut always lead you in the right direction or does it lead you astray?”

    - This is just based on my personal experience, ofc. To answer your question I have to make a difference between gut reactions and gut instincts (no deep meaning behind the seperation, I just had to call them something). I would say “gut reactions” are when my whole body reacts (often in fear, flight or fight) and it all starts with a “gut feeling”). It’s a reactive, nonverbal feeling that envelops my very Being – and I guess these reactions are good as a quick reflex in dangerous situations. But if such a reaction comes just as a result of an association (rather than a real enviromental danger), and I then begin to plan/think/act upon such an “irrational fear”, then such a gut feeling might be misguiding me.

    On the other hand I might feel “deeper” or “heavier” gut feelings that are either “good” or “bad” – one could say they are coded in simple Y/N – black/white, but they do not create the incoherent physical chaos that the earlier labeled “gut reactions” do. And they do have more direction and “intent”. These gut feelings (or gut instincts as I named them to differentiate them from gut reactions) often lead me in the right direction.

    So to mix it up with a little RPT and Antonovsky lingo; the gut reactions come in situations where I (perhaps subconsiously) have no Sense of Coherence, and there’s little coherence within myself – and the gut instincts come in situations where I have a stronger Sense of Coherence and thus also more “Coherence” in a RPT sense too :)

    Hope I made myself understandable.

    You write: “[Incidentally speaking of my fear of speaking out, I have barely mentioned evolution on this blog for fear of offending my Christian and Moslem readers. That will change very soon as I believe I have found ways to explore the facts of evolution without upsetting too many people's Gods.]”

    I’m looking forward to seeing this. I’ve been talking about evolution etc. with some Christian friends of mine, and while they accept the theory of evolution as a fact, they still need “God” as a creator of the Universe. It was pretty weird actually, since these folks are really smart and reflective, but they couldn’t see how the Universe came into being without there being a Creator.

    “I strive to unite 2 schools of thought that have never before been united, the Tao and ultra-Darwinism. Two universal truths (not merely beliefs) that merely haven’t been combined before. If you hear me speak of “spiritual atheism” it is this unity I refer to.”

    I’m with you on this, at least as far as I understand spiritual atheism. And I’m also trying to combine 2 schools of “thought” – RPT and “those who haven’t done any woo-woo healing-stuff before” . Perhaps our two goals collide, but to be frank I believe RPT (not as technique, but in the as it is described in the manuals) suffer a little because you use time described f.ex the difference between Being and Connecting, as well as other subtle new-age references throughout the text, that people from “outside” the new-age community have no need to know (few of my fellow physiotherapists, nurses, or osteopaths etc take healing-courses, and RPT is so close to CBT and other cognitive work that it is a shame that RPT should be stained with new-age-marks). The part with Being/Connecting etc. could instead be about Being-in-the-World ala Merlaeu-Ponty or Heidegger as well as different theories about empathy etc.

    I was working on giving you a full list over all the information in the manuals that is incoherent to a person without any earlier healer-experience, but it proved to be “to much work”. So I therefore I decided to use the comment-section to state my view :)

    [Reply]

  6. Hello Simon! I’m very interested in your philosophy and discussions because I’m Thetahealing practitioner also I’m doing sessions on ICAN technique by Dmitry Eshenko (your promoter in Russia). Taoist philosophy is very close to me as well since Im teaching inner smile meditation even though I’m muslim and was born in Asia. So it’s just introduction. My question is related to LOA and God Intervention theory. You know that there are many healers especially in Central Asia and Eastern Europe who treat people by praying. When I was 19 one healer healed me by giving herbs and praying soorahs from Quran. And he helped me I felt very good 6 months before I was seeking for right healer and was not successful in it I ‘ve seen so many healers they all could say smth about me about my life but they were not able to heal me. So what happens when healer prays for his patient (client) who heals? God or healer? This topic is close to God’s Intervention topic. Thank you in advance for your response.

    [Reply]

    Simon Rose Reply:

    Hi Asset
    Thanks for your excellent question. There are many issues here and no simple answer. Here are some thoughts.

    Firstly the science: every study of prayer healing has shown that it is a placebo. There has never in history been evidence that prayer heals.

    With regard to your story – it’s more likely the herbs healed you than the prayer. I’ve seen some wonderful results with herbal remedies. After all, most pharmaceutical medicine starts with herbs as a base.

    As to your question:
    > So what happens when healer prays for his patient (client) who heals? God or healer?

    Well since you are asking ME this question MY answer is obvious. In fact I’ve written about this before (“Healing World’s Dirty Secret” – it’s the Healer who heals, not the healing modality or God). Since I do believe in healing and I don’t believe in “God” (by usual definition) or divine intervention, obviously it’s the healer who heals. If you go to a healer for prayer (or even Theta or Reiki or whatever flavor-of-the-month), they are creating a connection of heart energy with you. It is this connection which *sometimes* heals the client. Not the modality or the invisible friends.

    The secret here is to work out why this sometimes works and sometimes not, and to make that connection more powerful so it always works. That’s really what RPT is about.

    Hope I’ve answered your question.

    Simon

    [Reply]

    Kerstin Reply:

    Hi Simon,
    How would you explain Masaru Emoto’s experiments of changing water quality (for the better) by prayer/focused intention? Not sure how the placebo effect would work in this case.
    I am referring to what you said:
    “Firstly the science: every study of prayer healing has shown that it is a placebo. There has never in history been evidence that prayer heals.”
    Thank you,~Kerstin
    Also, what about the intention experiment, where i.e. plants in a lab who get prayer or focused intention to grow better and faster actually do so?
    Thanks again

    [Reply]

  7. Simon – about the Healer being the one who heals:

    I’m only a Level 2 graduate. My personal experience seems to be that I “facilitate” healing. I cannot help if a person rejects healing at some level. When I facilitate healing – it seems effortless on my part, but I get good reports back from the people about themselves or their pets.

    I am interested in finding out how you have restructured RPT since I took Levels 1 and 2 in Anaheim in 2009.
    Donna

    [Reply]

  8. Hi Simon,
    How would you explain Masaru Emoto’s experiments of changing water quality (for the better) by prayer/focused intention? Not sure how the placebo effect would work in this case.
    I am referring to what you said:
    “Firstly the science: every study of prayer healing has shown that it is a placebo. There has never in history been evidence that prayer heals.”
    Thank you,~Kerstin

    [Reply]

    Simon Rose Reply:

    hi Kirsten
    Please accept my apologies for a ridiculously late reply. I was just cleaning up this blog before transferring to our new name/website, and I found your unanswered question. I’m so sorry. Better late than never right?

    The short answer is that Emoto is an artist, but not a scientist. He does not have a science training or PhD. He is an artist. He developed a technique for making beautiful photos of snowflakes (that is what ice crystals are called). His snowflakes are wonderful and sometimes inspiring. If you use his snowflake photos to inspire your students, this is good. If you try to make scientific conclusions out of it, that’s called self-deception. Unfortunately, as much as I love Emoto the artist, he does cross the line into self-deception. He admits freely in his book that he chooses the snowflake that he likes (i.e. non-scientifically and non-systematically) for each message. He subjectively chooses the snowflake that matches the message he wants to convey. Again, I love Emoto the artist, but I object to him or anyone pretending that this wonderful art has any scientific value in the study of prayer or intention.

    Just an aside on Emoto – I was quite curious so I read some of the scientific studies and rebuttals of his work. One of them made a most excellent point. As Emoto showed, Tokyo tap water does not make crystals (snowflakes). But some spring water does. Why? Because in nature, you need impurities (salts, chemicals, etc) to form crystals. A raindrop requires a “seed” (hence rainmaking by “seeding clouds.” A snowflake is basically a crystal of water formed around a seed. No two snowflakes are alike because no two impurities (seeds) are alike. Point being – the water that Emoto finds with the most beautiful snowflakes might be the water with the most dangerous impurities. Perhaps (I have not tested it) more dangerous impurities like arsenic might make more beautiful impurities than less dangerous impurities like silicon, sodium or calcium. In other words, Tokyo tapwater, with its zero crystals, might prove to be much better for your health than the other water with the pretty crystals. Makes you think twice about his artwork right?

    Love
    Simon

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply

*

Using Gravatars in the comments - get your own and be recognized!

XHTML: These are some of the tags you can use: <a href=""> <b> <blockquote> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>